The poor prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) underscores the need for risk stratification. We evaluated 84 consecutive sarcoidosis patients who were referred for echocardiographic studies for cardiac symptoms or abnormal electrocardiograms. In 54 patients without previous diagnosis of CS or other known structural heart disease, 13 reached endpoints during (median) 24 months follow up. Significantly impaired peak systolic longitudinal strain in their original echocardiograms were identified in 13 of 17 left ventricular segments, clustering in the free wall, interventricular septum and apex. The regional (including 13 clustered segments) peak systolic longitudinal strain (RPSLS) were significantly impaired in patients with endpoints, compared with those without [(-11.4 ± 4.45) vs. (-18.7 ± 3.76) %, P < 0.00001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that RPSLS was independently associated with endpoints (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.42, P = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic curve suggested a cut-off RPSLS value of -15.0% (84.6% sensitivity and 86.8% specificity) to predict the occurrence of endpoints. Impaired RPSLS correlates with risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with extra-cardiac sarcoidosis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,577,645
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,058
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,377
of 329,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
