↓ Skip to main content

Genetic contributions to visuospatial cognition in Williams syndrome: insights from two contrasting partial deletion patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genetic contributions to visuospatial cognition in Williams syndrome: insights from two contrasting partial deletion patients
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1866-1955-6-18
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder arising from a hemizygotic deletion of approximately 27 genes on chromosome 7, at locus 7q11.23. WS is characterised by an uneven cognitive profile, with serious deficits in visuospatial tasks in comparison to relatively proficient performance in some other cognitive domains such as language and face processing. Individuals with partial genetic deletions within the WS critical region (WSCR) have provided insights into the contribution of specific genes to this complex phenotype. However, the combinatorial effects of different genes remain elusive.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,858,945
of 26,406,115 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#351
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,429
of 242,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,406,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.