↓ Skip to main content

New advances in CMV and immunosenescence

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Gerontology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New advances in CMV and immunosenescence
Published in
Experimental Gerontology, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Immunosenescence, defined as the age-associated dysregulation and dysfunction of the immune system, is characterized by impaired protective immunity and decreased efficacy of vaccines. An increasing number of immunological, clinical and epidemiological studies suggest that persistent Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with accelerated aging of the immune system and with several age-related diseases. However, current evidence on whether and how human CMV (HCMV) infection is implicated in immunosenescence and in age-related diseases remains incomplete and many aspects of CMV involvement in immune aging remain controversial. The attendees of the 4th International Workshop on "CMV & Immunosenescence", held in Parma, Italy, 25-27th March, 2013, presented and discussed data related to these open questions, which are reported in this commentary.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 52 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 56 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2026.
All research outputs
#6,153,256
of 34,626,533 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Gerontology
#919
of 3,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,222
of 270,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Gerontology
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,626,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.