↓ Skip to main content

Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making: Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationships

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Social Work, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making: Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationships
Published in
British Journal of Social Work, March 2011
DOI 10.1093/bjsw/bcr012
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Master 12 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 8 10%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 23 27%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 68%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,193,463
of 27,632,712 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Social Work
#1,310
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,785
of 126,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Social Work
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,632,712 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.