↓ Skip to main content

Chemical and Genetic Engineering of Selective Ion Channel–Ligand Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
676 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chemical and Genetic Engineering of Selective Ion Channel–Ligand Interactions
Published in
Science, September 2011
DOI 10.1126/science.1206606
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ionic flux mediates essential physiological and behavioral functions in defined cell populations. Cell type-specific activators of diverse ionic conductances are needed for probing these effects. We combined chemistry and protein engineering to enable the systematic creation of a toolbox of ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs) with orthogonal pharmacologic selectivity and divergent functional properties. The LGICs and their small-molecule effectors were able to activate a range of ionic conductances in genetically specified cell types. LGICs constructed for neuronal perturbation could be used to selectively manipulate neuron activity in mammalian brains in vivo. The diversity of ion channel tools accessible from this approach will be useful for examining the relationship between neuronal activity and animal behavior, as well as for cell biological and physiological applications requiring chemical control of ion conductance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 24 4%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Japan 6 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 623 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 177 26%
Researcher 153 23%
Student > Master 54 8%
Student > Bachelor 52 8%
Professor 36 5%
Other 102 15%
Unknown 102 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 252 37%
Neuroscience 156 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 5%
Chemistry 23 3%
Other 58 9%
Unknown 106 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,020,863
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Science
#18,844
of 93,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,670
of 170,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#126
of 645 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 645 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.