↓ Skip to main content

THE EMERGENCE OF UNTRAINED MANDS AND TACTS IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
THE EMERGENCE OF UNTRAINED MANDS AND TACTS IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM
Published in
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, February 2013
DOI 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-265
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite Skinner's (1957) assertion that verbal operants are initially functionally independent, recent studies have suggested that in some cases the acquisition of one verbal operant (e.g., mand) gives rise to the other (e.g., tact) without explicit training. The present study aimed to evaluate the functional independence of mands and tacts during instruction with children with autism. Four boys with autism (3 to 6 years old) were taught to construct two 4-piece structures. Two participants were taught directly to mand, whereas the other 2 were taught to tact the names of the pieces. The effects of training were evaluated in a multiple probe design across verbal operants and tasks. Three of the 4 participants demonstrated an immediate transfer of control from 1 verbal operant to the other. These results were consistent with previous research with typically developing young children.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Professor 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 49%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,782,907
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
#848
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,589
of 193,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
#366
of 586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.