↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of pregnant women receiving osteopathic care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experiences of pregnant women receiving osteopathic care
Published in
Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Sheraton, Julie Streckfuss, Sandra Grace

Abstract

The state of women's health during pregnancy and in the post-natal period can have profound and long-term effects on their own health and that of their children. Women are increasingly seeking complementary and alternative therapies during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of women who received osteopathic treatment during pregnancy. This phenomenological study used semi-structured interviews with pregnant patients who were undergoing osteopathic care in northern NSW and south-east Queensland, Australia. Data were analysed thematically. Osteopathic care provided symptom relief, particularly for low back and pelvic pain. Participants wanted a natural childbirth with minimal medical intervention if possible. Osteopathic care was perceived as helping prepare women's bodies for birth and in so doing helped alleviate anxieties associated with childbirth and with entering the mainstream medical system. Pregnant women receiving osteopathic care reported experiencing physical and mental health benefits both during pregnancy and in the post-natal period.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Other 10 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Lecturer 6 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 95 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 101 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,460,972
of 34,020,007 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies
#439
of 1,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,069
of 353,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies
#9
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,020,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.