↓ Skip to main content

Membrane-based techniques for the separation and purification of proteins: An overview

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,104)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
31 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
921 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Membrane-based techniques for the separation and purification of proteins: An overview
Published in
Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, August 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.cis.2008.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Membrane processes are increasingly reported for various applications in both upstream and downstream technology, such as microfiltration, ultrafiltration, emerging processes as membrane chromatography, high performance tangential flow filtration and electrophoretic membrane contactor. Membrane-based processes are playing critical role in the field of separation/purification of biotechnological products. Membranes became an integral part of biotechnology and improvements in membrane technology are now focused on high resolution of bioproduct. In bioseparation, applications of membrane technologies include protein production/purification, protein-virus separation. This manuscript provides an overview of recent developments and published literature in membrane technology, focusing on special characteristics of the membranes and membrane-based processes that are now used for the production and purification of proteins.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 921 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Austria 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Croatia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 896 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 168 18%
Student > Master 158 17%
Student > Bachelor 90 10%
Researcher 86 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 109 12%
Unknown 259 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 153 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 14%
Chemical Engineering 95 10%
Chemistry 95 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 5%
Other 90 10%
Unknown 309 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,521,868
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Colloid & Interface Science
#21
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,190
of 136,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Colloid & Interface Science
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.