↓ Skip to main content

Individual Movement Variability Magnitudes Are Explained by Cortical Neural Variability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Individual Movement Variability Magnitudes Are Explained by Cortical Neural Variability
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, August 2017
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1650-17.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Humans exhibit considerable motor variability even across trivial reaching movements. This variability can be separated into specific kinematic components such as extent and direction, which are thought to be governed by distinct neural processes. Here, we report that individual subjects (males and females) exhibit different magnitudes of kinematic variability, which are consistent (within individual) across movements to different targets and regardless of which arm (right or left) was used to perform the movements. Simultaneous fMRI recordings revealed that the same subjects also exhibited different magnitudes of fMRI variability across movements in a variety of motor system areas. These fMRI variability magnitudes were also consistent across movements to different targets when performed with either arm. Cortical fMRI variability in the posterior-parietal cortex of individual subjects explained their movement-extent variability. This relationship was apparent only in posterior-parietal cortex and not in other motor system areas, thereby suggesting that individuals with more variable movement preparation exhibit larger kinematic variability. We, therefore, propose that neural and kinematic variability are reliable and interrelated individual characteristics that may predispose individual subjects to exhibit distinct motor capabilities.Significance Statement: Neural activity and movement kinematics are remarkably variable. While this intertrial variability is mostly over looked, here we demonstrate that individual human subjects exhibit distinct magnitudes of neural and kinematic variability, which are stable across movements to different targets and when performing these movements with either arm. Furthermore, when examining the relationship between cortical variability and movement variability, we find that cortical fMRI variability in the parietal cortex of individual subjects explained their movement extent variability. Hence, we were able to explain why some subjects performed more variable movements than others based on their cortical variability magnitudes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 24 17%
Other 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 34 24%
Engineering 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Psychology 12 8%
Sports and Recreations 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,014,646
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#3,914
of 23,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,695
of 357,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#56
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.