↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a Major Disaster on the Mental Health of a Well-Studied Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Psychiatry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of a Major Disaster on the Mental Health of a Well-Studied Cohort
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, September 2014
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.652
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There has been growing research into the mental health consequences of major disasters. Few studies have controlled for prospectively assessed mental health. This article describes a natural experiment in which 57% of a well-studied birth cohort was exposed to a major natural disaster (the Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes in 2010-2011), with the remainder living outside of the earthquake area.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 3 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 346 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 128 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 16%
Social Sciences 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 143 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#477,604
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#832
of 3,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,651
of 277,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#9
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.