↓ Skip to main content

Genome interplay in the grain transcriptome of hexaploid bread wheat

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome interplay in the grain transcriptome of hexaploid bread wheat
Published in
Science, July 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1250091
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Allohexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) provides approximately 20% of calories consumed by humans. Lack of genome sequence for the three homeologous and highly similar bread wheat genomes (A, B, and D) has impeded expression analysis of the grain transcriptome. We used previously unknown genome information to analyze the cell type-specific expression of homeologous genes in the developing wheat grain and identified distinct co-expression clusters reflecting the spatiotemporal progression during endosperm development. We observed no global but cell type- and stage-dependent genome dominance, organization of the wheat genome into transcriptionally active chromosomal regions, and asymmetric expression in gene families related to baking quality. Our findings give insight into the transcriptional dynamics and genome interplay among individual grain cell types in a polyploid cereal genome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 351 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 21%
Student > Master 31 8%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 68 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 227 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 14%
Computer Science 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Environmental Science 3 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 77 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2025.
All research outputs
#876,898
of 29,284,049 outputs
Outputs from Science
#17,133
of 87,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,362
of 245,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#198
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,284,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.