↓ Skip to main content

Virtual Reality Lead Extraction as a Method for Training New Physicians: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Virtual Reality Lead Extraction as a Method for Training New Physicians: A Pilot Study
Published in
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, December 2014
DOI 10.1111/pace.12546
Pubmed ID
Authors

MELANIE MAYTIN, THOMAS P. DAILY, ROGER G. CARILLO

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 45 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 27%
Psychology 11 10%
Computer Science 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 46 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2025.
All research outputs
#3,359,854
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
#109
of 4,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,345
of 415,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,526 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.