↓ Skip to main content

B cell immunosenescence: different features of naive and memory B cells in elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Biogerontology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
B cell immunosenescence: different features of naive and memory B cells in elderly
Published in
Biogerontology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10522-011-9353-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Elderly people show a reduced protection against new infections and a decreased response to vaccines as a consequence of impairment of both cellular and humoral immunity. In this paper we have studied memory/naïve B cells in the elderly, evaluating surface immunoglobulin expression, production of the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-10, and presence of somatic hypermutation, focusing on the IgG(+)IgD(-)CD27(-) double negative (DN) B cells that are expanded in the elderly. Our results show that naïve B cells from young donors need a sufficiently strong stimulus to be activated "in vitro", while naïve B cells from old subjects are able to produce IL-10 and TNF-α when stimulated "physiologically" (α-CD40/IL-4), suggesting that these cells might play a role in the control of the immuno-inflammatory environment in the elderly. In addition, in the elderly there is an accumulation of DN B cells with a reduced rate of somatic hypermutation. Thus, DN B lymphocytes may be exhausted cells that are expanded and accumulate as a by-product of persistent stimulation or impaired germinal center formation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,145,561
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Biogerontology
#555
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,612
of 124,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogerontology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.