↓ Skip to main content

Crosstalk between Muscularis Macrophages and Enteric Neurons Regulates Gastrointestinal Motility

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
699 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Crosstalk between Muscularis Macrophages and Enteric Neurons Regulates Gastrointestinal Motility
Published in
Cell, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.050
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Intestinal peristalsis is a dynamic physiologic process influenced by dietary and microbial changes. It is tightly regulated by complex cellular interactions; however, our understanding of these controls is incomplete. A distinct population of macrophages is distributed in the intestinal muscularis externa. We demonstrate that, in the steady state, muscularis macrophages regulate peristaltic activity of the colon. They change the pattern of smooth muscle contractions by secreting bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), which activates BMP receptor (BMPR) expressed by enteric neurons. Enteric neurons, in turn, secrete colony stimulatory factor 1 (CSF1), a growth factor required for macrophage development. Finally, stimuli from microbial commensals regulate BMP2 expression by macrophages and CSF1 expression by enteric neurons. Our findings identify a plastic, microbiota-driven crosstalk between muscularis macrophages and enteric neurons that controls gastrointestinal motility. PAPERFLICK:

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 699 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 685 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 22%
Researcher 117 17%
Student > Master 66 9%
Student > Bachelor 59 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 6%
Other 102 15%
Unknown 160 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 129 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 11%
Neuroscience 45 6%
Other 40 6%
Unknown 181 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,206,482
of 32,836,612 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#4,610
of 19,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,746
of 265,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#59
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,836,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.