The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in patients with knee osteoarthritis, whether seated postural control is a multivariate predictor of gait speed, after adjusting for the effects of conventional knee impairments. Sixty-seven patients with knee osteoarthritis awaiting total knee replacement participated. To measure seated postural control, patients sat on a balance board, and the centre-of-pressure (COP) measures calculated in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) directions were standard deviation (SD) and mean frequency (MF). Isometric knee extensor strength was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer; knee flexion range-of-motion, an extendable goniometer; and knee pain intensity, a numeric pain rating scale. Fast-pace gait speed was assessed by the 10-m walk test and a poor gait speed was defined at a cutoff value of 1.0m/s. At the univariate level, the seated COP measures, with the exception of AP-MF, discriminated between patients with and without poor gait speed; however, only ML-MF retained its predictive value in multivariable analyses adjusted for demographic, anthropometric, and knee impairment measures. These findings suggest that seated postural control may be an important correlate of physical function in patients with knee OA and that greater emphasis in the assessment of trunk control may be warranted in this population.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,694,404
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Gait & Posture
#2,814
of 3,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,999
of 193,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gait & Posture
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
