↓ Skip to main content

Reduction of Patient Anxiety in PET/CT Imaging by Improving Communication Between Patient and Technologist

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of nuclear medicine technology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reduction of Patient Anxiety in PET/CT Imaging by Improving Communication Between Patient and Technologist
Published in
Journal of nuclear medicine technology, July 2014
DOI 10.2967/jnmt.114.139915
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients experience anxiety during imaging procedures because of the confined space, uncertainty about the procedure, worry about the results, and other concerns. When a patient experiences anxiety during PET/CT imaging, the quality of the scan can be affected in several ways. Current patient-technologist communication is limited in PET/CT because the technologist must be separated from the patient during the course of the imaging workflow. This study investigated the use of a call device enabling rapid communication to reduce patient anxiety.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 22%
Student > Master 8 7%
Researcher 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 49 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Psychology 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 47 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#10,723,471
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of nuclear medicine technology
#134
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,395
of 255,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of nuclear medicine technology
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.