↓ Skip to main content

Municipal gravity sewers: An unrecognised source of nitrous oxide

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Municipal gravity sewers: An unrecognised source of nitrous oxide
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.051
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a primary ozone-depleting substance and powerful greenhouse gas. N2O emissions from secondary-level wastewater treatment processes are relatively well understood as a result of intensive international research effort in recent times, yet little information exists to date on the role of sewers in wastewater management chain N2O dynamics. Here we provide the first detailed assessment of N2O levels in the untreated influent (i.e. sewer network effluent) of three large Australian metropolitan wastewater treatment plants. Contrary to current international (IPCC) guidance, results show gravity sewers to be a likely source of N2O. Results from the monitoring program revealed hydraulic flow rate as a strong driver for N2O generation in gravity sewers, with microbial processes (nitrification and possibly denitrification) implicated as the main processes responsible for its production. Results were also used to develop a presumptive emission factor for N2O in the context of municipal gravity sewers. Considering the discrepancy with current IPCC Guidelines, further work is warranted to assess the scale and dynamics of N2O production in sewers elsewhere.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 31%
Engineering 21 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#24,378,550
of 33,953,699 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#25,608
of 36,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,688
of 241,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#103
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,953,699 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.