↓ Skip to main content

Multivariate Searchlight Classification of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children and Adolescents with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychiatry, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multivariate Searchlight Classification of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children and Adolescents with Autism
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders with a prevalence of nearly 1:100. Structural imaging studies point to disruptions in multiple brain areas, yet the precise neuroanatomical nature of these disruptions remains unclear. Characterization of brain structural differences in children with ASD is critical for development of biomarkers that may eventually be used to improve diagnosis and monitor response to treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 269 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 54 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 22%
Neuroscience 32 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Computer Science 17 6%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 71 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,932,488
of 32,221,736 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#2,041
of 7,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,918
of 163,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#17
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,221,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.