↓ Skip to main content

Retained Surgical Sponges: Findings from Incident Reports and a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Radiofrequency Technology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Retained Surgical Sponges: Findings from Incident Reports and a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Radiofrequency Technology
Published in
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.052
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Retained surgical items (RSIs) are serious events with a high potential to harm patients. It is estimated that as many as 1 in 5,500 operations result in an RSI, and sponges are most commonly involved. The adverse outcomes, additional medical care needed, and medico-legal costs associated with these events are substantial. The objective of this analysis was to advance our understanding of the occurrence of RSIs, the methods of prevention, and the costs involved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 22%
Engineering 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#312,931
of 31,970,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#79
of 5,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,168
of 261,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,970,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.