↓ Skip to main content

SWOG0919: a Phase 2 study of idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with pravastatin for relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Haematology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SWOG0919: a Phase 2 study of idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with pravastatin for relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia
Published in
British Journal of Haematology, July 2014
DOI 10.1111/bjh.13035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and uptake sensitizes acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) blasts to chemotherapy. A Phase 1 study demonstrated the safety of high dose pravastatin given with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with AML and also demonstrated an encouraging response rate. The Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) trial, SWOG S0919, was a Phase 2 trial evaluating the complete remission (CR) rate in a larger number of patients with relapsed AML treated with idarubicin, cytarabine and pravastatin. This study closed to accrual after meeting the defined criterion for a positive study. Thirty-six patients with a median age of 59 years (range 23-78) were enrolled. The median time from diagnosis to registration was 18 months. Relapse status was first relapse, 17 patients (47%); second relapse, 15 patients (42%); third relapse, two patients (5·5%) and fourth relapse, two patients (5·5%). The response rate was 75% [95% confidence interval: 58-88%; 20 CRs, 7 CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)], and the median overall survival was 12 months. The P-value comparing 75-30% (the null response rate based on prior SWOG experience) was 3·356 × 10(-4) . Given the encouraging CR/CRi rate, this regimen should be considered for testing in a prospective randomized trial against best conventional therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,021,565
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#5,212
of 7,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,851
of 233,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#36
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.