↓ Skip to main content

A Reinforcement Learning Mechanism Responsible for the Valuation of Free Choice

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
13 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Reinforcement Learning Mechanism Responsible for the Valuation of Free Choice
Published in
Neuron, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Humans exhibit a preference for options they have freely chosen over equally valued options they have not; however, the neural mechanism that drives this bias and its functional significance have yet to be identified. Here, we propose a model in which choice biases arise due to amplified positive reward prediction errors associated with free choice. Using a novel variant of a probabilistic learning task, we show that choice biases are selective to options that are predominantly associated with positive outcomes. A polymorphism in DARPP-32, a gene linked to dopaminergic striatal plasticity and individual differences in reinforcement learning, was found to predict the effect of choice as a function of value. We propose that these choice biases are the behavioral byproduct of a credit assignment mechanism responsible for ensuring the effective delivery of dopaminergic reinforcement learning signals broadcast to the striatum.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 13 4%
France 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 333 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 28%
Researcher 75 20%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 34 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 113 31%
Neuroscience 80 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 5%
Computer Science 14 4%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 56 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,113,208
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#1,841
of 9,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,630
of 244,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#26
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.