↓ Skip to main content

Membrane deformation and scission by the HSV-1 nuclear egress complex

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Membrane deformation and scission by the HSV-1 nuclear egress complex
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms5131
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The nuclear egress complex (NEC) of herpesviruses such as HSV-1 is essential for the exit of nascent capsids from the cell nucleus. The NEC drives nuclear envelope vesiculation in cells, but the precise budding mechanism and the potential involvement of cellular proteins are unclear. Here we report that HSV-1 NEC alone is sufficient for membrane budding in vitro and thus represents a complete membrane deformation and scission machinery. It forms ordered coats on the inner surface of the budded vesicles, suggesting that it mediates scission by scaffolding the membrane bud and constricting the neck to the point of scission. The inward topology of NEC-mediated budding in vitro resembles capsid budding into the inner nuclear membrane during HSV-1 infection and nuclear envelope vesiculation in NEC-transfected cells. We propose that the NEC functions as minimal virus-encoded membrane-budding machinery during nuclear egress and does not require additional cellular factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 32%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Chemistry 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#10,554,176
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#60,005
of 81,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,688
of 275,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#528
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.