↓ Skip to main content

Nuts Improve Diet Quality Compared to Other Energy‐Dense Snacks While Maintaining Body Weight

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutrition & Metabolism, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 436)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nuts Improve Diet Quality Compared to Other Energy‐Dense Snacks While Maintaining Body Weight
Published in
Journal of Nutrition & Metabolism, August 2011
DOI 10.1155/2011/357350
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have reported that regular nut consumption reduces cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and does not promote weight gain despite the fact that nuts are energy-dense. However, no studies have investigated the body composition of those regularly consuming nuts compared to similar intakes of other snacks of equal energy density. This parallel study (n = 118) examined the effects of providing daily portions (~1100 kJ/d) of hazelnuts, chocolate, or potato crisps compared to a control group receiving no snacks for twelve weeks. Effects on body weight and composition, blood lipids and lipoproteins, resting metabolic rate (RMR), appetite indices, and dietary quality were compared. At week 12, there was no significant difference in any of the outcome measurements between the groups except for dietary quality, which improved significantly in the nut group. Nuts can be incorporated into the diet without adversely affecting body weight and can improve diet quality.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
India 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2026.
All research outputs
#835,988
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition & Metabolism
#39
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,892
of 168,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition & Metabolism
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.