↓ Skip to main content

The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Neurobiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication
Published in
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human speech and language underlie many aspects of social behavior and thus understanding their ultimate evolutionary function and proximate genetic and neural mechanisms is a fundamental goal in neuroscience. Mouse ultrasonic vocalizations have recently received enormous attention as possible models for human speech. This attention has raised the question of whether these vocalizations are learned and what roles they play in communication. In this review, we first discuss recent evidence that ultrasonic vocalizations are not learned. We then review current evidence addressing how adult vocalizations may communicate courtship, territorial and/or other information. While there is growing evidence that these signals play key roles in communication, many important questions remain unanswered.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 267 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 22%
Researcher 43 16%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 52 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 26%
Neuroscience 69 25%
Psychology 23 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Linguistics 6 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 65 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2025.
All research outputs
#8,898,699
of 28,437,094 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Neurobiology
#1,155
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,145
of 243,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Neurobiology
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,437,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.