↓ Skip to main content

Positive Affect Processing and Joint Attention in Infants at High Risk for Autism: An Exploratory Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Positive Affect Processing and Joint Attention in Infants at High Risk for Autism: An Exploratory Study
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2191-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Few behavioral indices of risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are present before 12 months, and potential biomarkers remain largely unexamined. This prospective study of infant siblings of children with ASD (n = 16) and low-risk comparison infants (n = 15) examined group differences in event-related potentials (ERPs) indexing processing of facial positive affect (N290/P400, Nc) at 9 months and their relation to joint attention at 15 months. Group differences were most pronounced for subtle facial expressions, in that the low-risk group exhibited relatively longer processing (P400 latency) and greater attention resource allocation (Nc amplitude). Exploratory analyses found associations between ERP responses and later joint attention, suggesting that attention to positive affect cues may support the development of other social competencies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 43%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#871,163
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#297
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,812
of 232,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.