↓ Skip to main content

RNA G-quadruplexes cause eIF4A-dependent oncogene translation in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
patent
11 patents

Readers on

mendeley
676 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RNA G-quadruplexes cause eIF4A-dependent oncogene translation in cancer
Published in
Nature, July 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13485
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The translational control of oncoprotein expression is implicated in many cancers. Here we report an eIF4A RNA helicase-dependent mechanism of translational control that contributes to oncogenesis and underlies the anticancer effects of silvestrol and related compounds. For example, eIF4A promotes T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia development in vivo and is required for leukaemia maintenance. Accordingly, inhibition of eIF4A with silvestrol has powerful therapeutic effects against murine and human leukaemic cells in vitro and in vivo. We use transcriptome-scale ribosome footprinting to identify the hallmarks of eIF4A-dependent transcripts. These include 5' untranslated region (UTR) sequences such as the 12-nucleotide guanine quartet (CGG)4 motif that can form RNA G-quadruplex structures. Notably, among the most eIF4A-dependent and silvestrol-sensitive transcripts are a number of oncogenes, superenhancer-associated transcription factors, and epigenetic regulators. Hence, the 5' UTRs of select cancer genes harbour a targetable requirement for the eIF4A RNA helicase.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 654 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 189 28%
Researcher 131 19%
Student > Master 63 9%
Student > Bachelor 61 9%
Professor 23 3%
Other 83 12%
Unknown 126 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 207 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 202 30%
Chemistry 54 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 2%
Other 34 5%
Unknown 136 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,238,271
of 31,634,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#37,019
of 111,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,259
of 258,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#496
of 971 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,634,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 98.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 971 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.