↓ Skip to main content

The Protein Data Bank archive as an open data resource

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 949)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Protein Data Bank archive as an open data resource
Published in
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10822-014-9770-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Protein Data Bank archive was established in 1971, and recently celebrated its 40th anniversary (Berman et al. in Structure 20:391, 2012). An analysis of interrelationships of the science, technology and community leads to further insights into how this resource evolved into one of the oldest and most widely used open-access data resources in biology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 201 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 19%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 7 3%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 49 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 14%
Computer Science 22 11%
Chemistry 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 56 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,138,490
of 28,731,329 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
#28
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,364
of 245,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,731,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.