↓ Skip to main content

Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00701-017-3318-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the long-term endocrine outcomes and postoperative complications following endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal resection (TSR) for the treatment of acromegaly. A literature review was performed, and studies with at least five patients who underwent TSR for acromegaly, reporting biochemical remission criteria and long-term remission outcomes were included. Data extracted from each study included surgical technique, perioperative complications, biochemical remission criteria, and long-term remission outcomes. Fifty-two case series from 1976 to 2016 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4375 patients. Thirty-six reports were microsurgical (n = 3144) and 13 were endoscopic (n = 940). Three studies compared microsurgical (n = 111) to endoscopic TSR outcomes (n = 180). The overall initial and long-term remission rates were 58.2 vs. 57.4% and 69.2 vs. 70.2% for the microsurgical and endoscopic groups, respectively. For microadenomas, the initial and long-term remission rates were 77.6 vs. 82.2% and 76.9 vs. 73.5% for microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, respectively. For macroadenomas, the initial and long-term remission rates were 46.9 vs. 60.0% and 40.2 vs. 61.5% for microsurgical and endoscopic approaches, respectively. The rates of postoperative CSF leak were 3.0 vs. 2.3% for the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. The rates of hypopituitarism and transient diabetes insipidus were 6.7 vs. 6.4% and 9.0 vs. 7.8% for the microscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Both endoscopic and microsurgical approaches for TSR of growth hormone-secreting adenomas are viable treatment options for patients with acromegaly, and yield similarly high rates of remission under the most current consensus criteria.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 34 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,427,740
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,283
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,687
of 316,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.