↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
43 X users
patent
127 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
guideline
11 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
508 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 496 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 17%
Researcher 61 12%
Student > Master 52 10%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 8%
Other 82 16%
Unknown 133 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 29%
Engineering 87 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 5%
Materials Science 15 3%
Other 59 12%
Unknown 147 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2026.
All research outputs
#726,892
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,509
of 38,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 30,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#11
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.