↓ Skip to main content

Rural–urban differences in acute myocardial infarction mortality: Evidence from Nebraska

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rural–urban differences in acute myocardial infarction mortality: Evidence from Nebraska
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jcdr.2014.01.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of death and disability in the United States and worldwide. Despite the importance of surveillance and secondary prevention, the incidence of and mortality from AMI are not continuously monitored, and little is known about survival outcomes after 30 days of AMI hospitalization or associated risk factors, especially in the rural areas. The current study examines rural-urban differences in both in- and out-hospital survival outcomes for AMI patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
#33
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,584
of 239,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.