↓ Skip to main content

Prefrontal cortex reactivity underlies trait vulnerability to chronic social defeat stress

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prefrontal cortex reactivity underlies trait vulnerability to chronic social defeat stress
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms5537
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Psychological stress contributes to the onset and exacerbation of nearly all neuropsychiatric disorders. Individual differences in stress-regulatory circuits can therefore dramatically affect vulnerability to these illnesses. Here we identify neural circuit mechanisms underlying individual differences in vulnerability to stress using a murine model of chronic social defeat stress. In chronically stressed mice, we find that the degree of prefrontal cortex (PFC) control of amygdala activity predicts stress susceptibility in individual mice. Critically, we also find that individual differences in PFC activation (that is, reactivity) during exposure to an aggressor mouse predict the emergence stress-induced behavioural deficits in stress-naïve mice. Finally, we show that naturally occurring differences in PFC reactivity directly correspond to the intrinsic firing rate of PFC neurons. This demonstrates that naturally occurring differences in PFC function underlie individual differences in vulnerability to stress, raising the hypothesis that PFC modulation may prevent stress-induced psychiatric disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 25%
Researcher 44 21%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 62 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 20%
Psychology 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 55 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2026.
All research outputs
#1,226,273
of 33,503,639 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#20,097
of 81,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,862
of 266,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#160
of 689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,503,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.