↓ Skip to main content

Myocardial AKT: The Omnipresent Nexus

Overview of attention for article published in Physiological Reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Myocardial AKT: The Omnipresent Nexus
Published in
Physiological Reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1152/physrev.00024.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One of the greatest examples of integrated signal transduction is revealed by examination of effects mediated by AKT kinase in myocardial biology. Positioned at the intersection of multiple afferent and efferent signals, AKT exemplifies a molecular sensing node that coordinates dynamic responses of the cell in literally every aspect of biological responses. The balanced and nuanced nature of homeostatic signaling is particularly essential within the myocardial context, where regulation of survival, energy production, contractility, and response to pathological stress all flow through the nexus of AKT activation or repression. Equally important, the loss of regulated AKT activity is primarily the cause or consequence of pathological conditions leading to remodeling of the heart and eventual decompensation. This review presents an overview compendium of the complex world of myocardial AKT biology gleaned from more than a decade of research. Summarization of the widespread influence that AKT exerts upon myocardial responses leaves no doubt that the participation of AKT in molecular signaling will need to be reckoned with as a seemingly omnipresent regulator of myocardial molecular biological responses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 162 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 24%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Reviews
#1,269
of 1,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,954
of 115,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Reviews
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.