↓ Skip to main content

The MAPP research network: design, patient characterization and operations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The MAPP research network: design, patient characterization and operations
Published in
BMC Urology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2490-14-58
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The "Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain" (MAPP) Research Network was established by the NIDDK to better understand the pathophysiology of urologic chronic pelvic pain syndromes (UCPPS), to inform future clinical trials and improve clinical care. The evolution, organization, and scientific scope of the MAPP Research Network, and the unique approach of the network's central study and common data elements are described.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 212 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Other 16 7%
Student > Master 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 39%
Psychology 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 57 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,344,516
of 31,684,203 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#86
of 1,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,515
of 258,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,684,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.