↓ Skip to main content

Bioluminescence and Its Impact on Bioanalysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bioluminescence and Its Impact on Bioanalysis
Published in
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, July 2011
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061010-113855
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is an increasing need for versatile yet sensitive labels, posed by the demands for low detection in bioanalysis. Bioluminescent proteins have many desirable characteristics, including the ability to be detected at extremely low concentrations; no background interference from autofluorescent compounds present in samples; and compatibility with many miniaturized platforms, such as lab-on-a-chip and lab-on-a-CD systems. Bioluminescent proteins have found a plethora of analytical applications in intracellular monitoring, genetic regulation and detection, immuno- and binding assays, and whole-cell biosensors, among others. As new bioluminescent organisms are discovered and new bioluminescence proteins are characterized, use of these proteins will continue to dramatically improve our understanding of molecular and cellular events, as well as their applications for detection of environmental and biomedical samples.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Engineering 7 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,441,362
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
#51
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,702
of 167,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.