↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol outlet density, levels of drinking and alcohol-related harm in New Zealand: a national study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Alcohol outlet density, levels of drinking and alcohol-related harm in New Zealand: a national study
Published in
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), October 2010
DOI 10.1136/jech.2009.104935
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous research shows associations of geographical density of alcohol outlets with a range of alcohol-related harms. Socioeconomic conditions that are associated with both outlet density and alcohol-related outcomes may confound many studies. We examined the association of outlet density with both consumption and harm throughout New Zealand while controlling for indicators of area deprivation and individual socioeconomic status (SES).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Social Sciences 18 15%
Psychology 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 36 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,503,357
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#1,318
of 5,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,964
of 154,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#20
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.