↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Critical Role of the Pathologist in Determining Eligibility for Active Surveillance as a Management Option in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Consensus Statement With Recommendations Supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists and the Prostate Cancer Foundation
Published in
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.5858/arpa.2014-0219-sa
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 35 27%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 39 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#768,558
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#78
of 3,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,019
of 273,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.