↓ Skip to main content

Signatures of selection in sheep bred for resistance or susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Signatures of selection in sheep bred for resistance or susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-637
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gastrointestinal nematodes are one of the most serious causes of disease in domestic ruminants worldwide. There is considerable variation in resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes within and between sheep breeds, which appears to be due to underlying genetic diversity. Through selection of resistant animals, rapid genetic progress has been demonstrated in both research and commercial flocks. Recent advances in genome sequencing and genomic technologies provide new opportunities to understand the ovine host response to gastrointestinal nematodes at the molecular level, and to identify polymorphisms conferring nematode resistance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 47%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 41 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,469,617
of 29,664,072 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,184
of 12,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,249
of 246,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#69
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,664,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.