↓ Skip to main content

Witnessing images of extreme violence: a psychological study of journalists in the newsroom

Overview of attention for article published in JRSM Open, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 242)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
95 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
26 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Witnessing images of extreme violence: a psychological study of journalists in the newsroom
Published in
JRSM Open, August 2014
DOI 10.1177/2054270414533323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Feinstein, Blair Audet, Elizabeth Waknine

Abstract

User Generated Content - photos and videos submitted to newsrooms by the public - has become a prominent source of information for news organisations. Journalists working with uncensored material can frequently witness disturbing images for prolonged periods. How this might affect their psychological health is not known and it is the focus of this study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 22%
Social Sciences 18 17%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 391. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#98,958
of 34,334,425 outputs
Outputs from JRSM Open
#3
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#659
of 273,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JRSM Open
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,334,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.