↓ Skip to main content

Adverse Outcome Pathway and Risks of Anticoagulant Rodenticides to Predatory Wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adverse Outcome Pathway and Risks of Anticoagulant Rodenticides to Predatory Wildlife
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, July 2014
DOI 10.1021/es501740n
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barnett A. Rattner, Rebecca S. Lazarus, John E. Elliott, Richard F. Shore, Nico van den Brink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 7 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 26%
Environmental Science 26 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,468,284
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#1,938
of 21,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,091
of 241,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#39
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.