↓ Skip to main content

Female condom skill and attitude: results from a NIDA Clinical Trials Network gender-specific HIV risk reduction study.

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS Education & Prevention, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Female condom skill and attitude: results from a NIDA Clinical Trials Network gender-specific HIV risk reduction study.
Published in
AIDS Education & Prevention, August 2011
DOI 10.1521/aeap.2011.23.4.329
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The female condom is effective in reducing unprotected sexual acts; however, it remains underutilized in the United States. This study examined whether a five-session HIV prevention intervention (Safer Sex Skills Building [SSB]), including presentation, discussion, and practice with female condoms, improved female condom skills and attitude among women in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Mixed-effects modeling was used to test the effect of SSB on skills and attitude over 3- and 6-month posttreatment among 515 randomized women. SSB was significantly associated with increases in skills and attitude, and the female condom demonstration session was primarily responsible for skills improvement. Attitude was a partial mediator of the intervention effect in reducing unprotected sex. Findings emphasize the utility of integrating female condom messages targeting proximal behavioral outcomes into HIV prevention. The study supports the use of female condom skill instruction via brief, hands-on exercises, as well as further research to enhance attitudinal change to reduce sexual risk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Puerto Rico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Psychology 16 17%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2012.
All research outputs
#4,622,427
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from AIDS Education & Prevention
#61
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,681
of 167,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS Education & Prevention
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them