Acute motor, neurocognitive and neurophysiological change following concussion injury in Australian amateur football. A prospective multimodal investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, July 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 4 news outlets

twitter: 18 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 193 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Acute motor, neurocognitive and neurophysiological change following concussion injury in Australian amateur football. A prospective multimodal investigation
Published in	Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, July 2014
DOI	10.1016/j.jsams.2014.07.010
Pubmed ID	25104044
Authors	Alan J. Pearce, Kate Hoy, Mark A. Rogers, Daniel T. Corp, Charlotte B. Davies, Jerome J. Maller, Paul B. Fitzgerald
Abstract	This multimodal study investigated the motor, neurocognitive and neurophysiological responses following a sports related concussion injury in the acute-phase (up to 10 days) in sub-elite Australian football players.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	4	22%
Australia	3	17%
United Kingdom	1	6%
Sweden	1	6%
Iceland	1	6%
Spain	1	6%
Unknown	7	39%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	13	72%
Scientists	3	17%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	6%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	1	6%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	3	2%
Portugal	1	<1%
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Canada	1	<1%
Unknown	187	97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Bachelor	28	15%
Student > Master	27	14%
Student > Ph. D. Student	24	12%
Researcher	19	10%
Student > Doctoral Student	15	8%
Other	30	16%
Unknown	50	26%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	40	21%
Sports and Recreations	23	12%
Neuroscience	20	10%
Psychology	13	7%
Nursing and Health Professions	12	6%
Other	24	12%
Unknown	61	32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.

All research outputs

#1,372,407

of 34,317,218 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

#334

of 3,261 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#11,140

of 270,009 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

of 45 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,317,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.