↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
guideline
17 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death
Published in
Circulation, August 2006
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.106.178233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas P Zipes, A John Camm, Martin Borggrefe, Alfred E Buxton, Bernard Chaitman, Martin Fromer, Gabriel Gregoratos, George Klein, Arthur J Moss, Robert J Myerburg, Silvia G Priori, Miguel A Quinones, Dan M Roden, Michael J Silka, Cynthia Tracy, Sidney C Smith, Alice K Jacobs, Cynthia D Adams, Elliott M Antman, Jeffrey L Anderson, Sharon A Hunt, Jonathan L Halperin, Rick Nishimura, Joseph P Ornato, Richard L Page, Barbara Riegel, Jean-Jacques Blanc, Andrzej Budaj, Veronica Dean, Jaap W Deckers, Catherine Despres, Kenneth Dickstein, John Lekakis, Keith McGregor, Marco Metra, Joao Morais, Ady Osterspey, Juan Luis Tamargo, José Luis Zamorano

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 412 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Other 36 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 36 8%
Other 121 28%
Unknown 91 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 247 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 105 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2026.
All research outputs
#765,230
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#2,024
of 28,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,190
of 128,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#6
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.