↓ Skip to main content

Low-Energy Termination of Graphene Edges via the Formation of Narrow Nanotubes

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Low-Energy Termination of Graphene Edges via the Formation of Narrow Nanotubes
Published in
Physical Review Letters, August 2011
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.107.065502
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We demonstrate that free graphene sheet edges can curl back on themselves, reconstructing as nanotubes. This results in lower formation energies than any other nonfunctionalized edge structure reported to date in the literature. We determine the critical tube size and formation barrier and compare with density functional simulations of other edge terminations including a new reconstructed Klein edge. Simulated high resolution electron microscopy images show why such rolled edges may be difficult to detect. Rolled zigzag edges serve as metallic conduction channels, separated from the neighboring bulk graphene by a chain of insulating sp(3)-carbon atoms, and introduce van Hove singularities into the graphene density of states.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Germany 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
China 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 35 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 34%
Researcher 12 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 43%
Materials Science 7 15%
Chemistry 5 11%
Engineering 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2011.
All research outputs
#13,339,330
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#21,949
of 36,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,303
of 121,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#159
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.