↓ Skip to main content

Compact genome of the Antarctic midge is likely an adaptation to an extreme environment

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
58 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Compact genome of the Antarctic midge is likely an adaptation to an extreme environment
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms5611
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The midge, Belgica antarctica, is the only insect endemic to Antarctica, and thus it offers a powerful model for probing responses to extreme temperatures, freeze tolerance, dehydration, osmotic stress, ultraviolet radiation and other forms of environmental stress. Here we present the first genome assembly of an extremophile, the first dipteran in the family Chironomidae, and the first Antarctic eukaryote to be sequenced. At 99 megabases, B. antarctica has the smallest insect genome sequenced thus far. Although it has a similar number of genes as other Diptera, the midge genome has very low repeat density and a reduction in intron length. Environmental extremes appear to constrain genome architecture, not gene content. The few transposable elements present are mainly ancient, inactive retroelements. An abundance of genes associated with development, regulation of metabolism and responses to external stimuli may reflect adaptations for surviving in this harsh environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 5 2%
France 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 249 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 25%
Researcher 58 21%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 19%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 50 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 351. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2026.
All research outputs
#114,989
of 34,205,147 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,692
of 82,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#774
of 274,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#9
of 707 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,205,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 707 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.