↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases and implications for cancer.

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical Society Transactions, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases and implications for cancer.
Published in
Biochemical Society Transactions, August 2014
DOI 10.1042/bst20140118
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is growing interest in the family of 2-OG (2-oxoglutarate)-dependent dioxygenase enzymes that catalyse the hydroxylation of a wide range of organic targets. Members of this family that regulate the cell's hypoxic response and epigenetic processes, particularly the demethylation of histones and DNA, have been identified in mammalian cells. The dependence of these enzymes on molecular oxygen and 2-OG as obligatory substrates, together with their need for iron and ascorbate as cofactors, has implications for their role as metabolic sensors. The oxygen-sensing property is utilized by the hydroxylases that regulate hypoxia-inducible factor and this has been well characterized, particularly with respect to tumour biology. However, the potential for metabolic sensing more generally is also of interest, and future research will expand our understanding of the effect of mitochondrial viability and nutrient (iron and ascorbate) supply on 2-OG-dependent dioxygenase activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2018.
All research outputs
#24,756,754
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Society Transactions
#4,010
of 4,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,869
of 274,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Society Transactions
#32
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.