↓ Skip to main content

The influence of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on walking performance in individuals with lower-limb impairments

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biomechanics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The influence of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on walking performance in individuals with lower-limb impairments
Published in
Clinical Biomechanics, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.07.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses utilize stiffness to improve gait performance through elastic energy storage and return. However, the influence of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on gait performance has not been systematically investigated, largely due to the difficulty of manufacturing devices with precisely controlled stiffness levels. Additive manufacturing techniques such as selective laser sintering have been used to successfully manufacture ankle-foot orthoses with controlled stiffness levels. The purpose of this study was to use passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses manufactured with selective laser sintering to identify the influence of orthosis stiffness on walking performance in patients with lower-limb neuromuscular and musculoskeletal impairments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 269 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 25%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Other 13 5%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 52 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 90 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 77 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#1,174
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,185
of 242,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#20
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.