↓ Skip to main content

Impaired mucus detachment disrupts mucociliary transport in a piglet model of cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impaired mucus detachment disrupts mucociliary transport in a piglet model of cystic fibrosis
Published in
Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1255825
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) is initiated by defective host defense that predisposes airways to bacterial infection. Advanced CF is characterized by a deficit in mucociliary transport (MCT), a process that traps and propels bacteria out of the lungs, but whether this deficit occurs first or is secondary to airway remodeling has been unclear. To assess MCT, we tracked movement of radiodense microdisks in airways of newborn piglets with CF. Cholinergic stimulation, which elicits mucus secretion, substantially reduced microdisk movement. Impaired MCT was not due to periciliary liquid depletion; rather, CF submucosal glands secreted mucus strands that remained tethered to gland ducts. Inhibiting anion secretion in non-CF airways replicated CF abnormalities. Thus, impaired MCT is a primary defect in CF, suggesting that submucosal glands and tethered mucus may be targets for early CF treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 260 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Master 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 79 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 12%
Engineering 16 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 87 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2026.
All research outputs
#860,227
of 34,159,433 outputs
Outputs from Science
#16,908
of 93,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,871
of 274,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#191
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,159,433 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.