↓ Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Spatial Object-Location Memory in a Virtual Grocery Store

Overview of attention for article published in CyberPsychology & Behavior, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sex Differences in Spatial Object-Location Memory in a Virtual Grocery Store
Published in
CyberPsychology & Behavior, August 2008
DOI 10.1089/cpb.2007.0058
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The grocery shopping Virtual Reality Spatial Object-Location Test (VRSOLT) was developed to examine sex differences in spatial object-location memory in a 3D virtual environment that simulates the real world. Forty college students (20 males, 20 females) were tested on the VRSOLT as well as mental rotation and 2D object-location memory tasks. Both convergent and divergent validity was demonstrated. Males showed an advantage on mental rotation, and results of the VRSOLT grocery store test replicated the female object-location advantage seen in 2D tests. A strategy of systematically navigating the environment may aid female encoding for object location.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 51 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 41%
Computer Science 7 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2014.
All research outputs
#26,628,283
of 32,151,140 outputs
Outputs from CyberPsychology & Behavior
#373
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,236
of 121,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CyberPsychology & Behavior
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,151,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.