Statistical flaws undermine pre-Columbian chicken debate

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet
blogs: 1 blog

twitter: 4 X users
reddit: 1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley: 12 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 4 X users, with an upper bound of 22,758 followers.

@SusaMorgan @Botanygeek Maybe, but if you look up the actual article that National Geographic is summarizing, you'll find that people have doubts about it. For example, here's one of several response also published by PNAS: https://t.co/NTKj2eMKXz

I am only tweeting this because I like the title http://t.co/upfe7mPPwi

"Statistical flaws undermine chicken debate" http://t.co/dr3qrPwZTb Shit just got real

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity.