↓ Skip to main content

Iron Deficiency Anemia—Bridging the Knowledge and Practice Gap

Overview of attention for article published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Iron Deficiency Anemia—Bridging the Knowledge and Practice Gap
Published in
Transfusion Medicine Reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.05.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite its high prevalence, anemia often does not receive proper clinical attention, and detection, evaluation, and management of iron deficiency anemia and iron-restricted erythropoiesis can possibly be an unmet medical need. A multidisciplinary panel of clinicians with expertise in anemia management convened and reviewed recent published data on prevalence, etiology, and health implications of anemia as well as current therapeutic options and available guidelines on management of anemia across various patient populations and made recommendations on the detection, diagnostic approach, and management of anemia. The available evidence confirms that the prevalence of anemia is high across all populations, especially in hospitalized patients. Anemia is associated with worse clinical outcomes including longer length of hospital stay, diminished quality of life, and increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and it is a modifiable risk factor of allogeneic blood transfusion with its own inherent risks. Iron deficiency is usually present in anemic patients. An algorithm for detection and management of anemia was discussed, which incorporated iron study (with primary emphasis on transferrin saturation), serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate, and vitamin B12 and folic acid measurements. Management strategies included iron therapy (oral or intravenous), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and referral as needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Unknown 286 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 13%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Other 22 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 85 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 91 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Transfusion Medicine Reviews
#362
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,567
of 241,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transfusion Medicine Reviews
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.